Can the ARTISTs complete the Schubert Unfinished (Sinfonie Nr. 7 in h moll D. 759 "Die Unvollendete")?
Cite this article as: Satoh T, Ishii H, Sakai D, Doki Y, Mori M. Can the ARTISTs complete the Schubert Unfinished (Sinfonie Nr. 7 in h moll D. 759 "Die Unvollendete")? Transl Gastrointest Cancer 2012;1:117-118. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4778. 2012.02.02
Research Highlight

Can the ARTISTs complete the Schubert Unfinished (Sinfonie Nr. 7 in h moll D. 759 "Die Unvollendete")?

Taroh Satoh1, Hideshi Ishii1,Daisuke Sakai2, Yuichiro Doki2, Masaki Mori2

1Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Japan; 2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Japan

Corresponding to:
Taroh Satoh MD, PhD. Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Tel: +81-06-6879-2641. Email: taroh@ cfs.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Transl Gastrointest Cancer 2012;1:117-118. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4778.2012.02.02

Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are proven treatment options for gastric cancer. D2 lymph node dissection has become a standard surgical technique after its usefulness was demonstrated by Sasako and colleagues as well as based on the findings of a 15-year follow-up in the Dutch Gastric Cancer Group assessed by Songun and colleagues (1,2).

Compared with D2 dissection alone, the survival time was prolonged in the S-1 monotherapy arm in the ACTSGC study by Sakuramoto and colleagues and in the XELOX therapy arm in the CLASSIC study by Bang and colleagues. Both studies reported the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy even in patients treated with D2 dissection. The subgroup analysis in the ACTS-GC study showed the surgery/adjuvant chemotherapy combination was useful for the treatment of stage II to IIIA gastric cancer treated with S-1 alone but not for cancer of stage IIIB or higher. On the other hand, the CLASSIC study showed the usefulness of XELOX therapy in all cancer stages (II to IIIB), suggesting the combination therapy will be required for the treatment of stage IIIA or higher gastric cancer (3,4).

The Intergroup 0116 study reported a prolonged survival time in patients treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy. However, most enrolled patients were treated with D1 dissection (5). In this context, the ARTIST study, performed to evaluate the usefulness of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients treated with the standard D2 dissection, is interesting (6).

The 53.2-month follow-up data from the ARTIST study revealed that the treatment completion rate was 75.4% in the XP arm and 81.7% in the XP/XRT/XP arm. While the XP/XRT/XP therapy was shown to be highly tolerable, no prolonged disease-free survival (DFS), the primary endpoint, was unfortunately demonstrated in this treatment arm. Although the subset analysis showed the DFS was longer in lymph node positive patients in the XP/XRT/XP arm, the ARTIST study has certain limitations.

First, do patients with stage IB or II cancer treated with D2 dissection really require chemoradiotherapy? These patients may be overtreated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Sasako and colleagues reported a 5-year DFS of 79.2% in patients with stage II cancer treated with D2 dissection followed by S-1 monotherapy only for 1 year (7). Japanese epidemiological data showed the 5-year survival rate from 80% to 90% in patients with stage IB cancer with the primary lesion in the gastric antrum and body (8).

Second, was XP appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy? The treatment completion rate was 81.7% in the XP/XRT/ XP arm; however, grade 3 or higher adverse reactions were reported at much higher frequencies in the study arms compared with in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with XP therapy (with CDDP at 80 mg/m2) in the ML17032 study reported by Kang and colleagues (9).

Based on the greater usefulness of XELOX therapy compared with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy reported by Bang and colleagues and the greater usefulness of EOX for advanced esophagogastric cancer compared with ECX suggested by Cunningham and colleagues (10), the combination of XELOX and XP therapy may be more desirable than XP alone. The combined XELOX and radiotherapy was more useful as a preoperative treatment for rectal cancer compared with adjuvant chemotherapy. A nonclinical study reported that oxaliplatin and radiotherapy upregulated thymidine phosphorylase, which converts capecitabine to 5FU in the tumor, suggesting a greater antitumor effect compared with other treatment (13,14).

Thirdly patients with diffuse type histology have poor outcome in N0116 study (15), in which chemoradiation benefited all subsets with the exceptions of women and diffuse histology. It is obvious that no selection by histopathology, in other words, not excluding diffuse histology might have negative impact on this study.

Finally, was the duration of treatment appropriate? XP and XP/XRT/XP were used for 18 weeks in the ARTIST study. Adjuvant S-1 was used for 1 year in the study performed by Sakaramoto and colleagues (3). A JCOG study is about to start to determine the Optimal Period of Adjuvant S-1(OPAS-1, JCOG1104, UMIN000007306), to confirm non-inferiority of 4 courses (24 weeks) of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy to 8 courses(1 year) of the same regimen in relapse-free survival in patients who underwent D1+/D2 gastrectomy and were diagnosed pathologically with stage II gastric cancer. Bang and colleagues used the XELOX therapy for 6 months. Whether the 6-month duration is recommended as it is for the adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer should be considered (4).

At any rate, the ARTIST study was definitely underpowered. The doctors should attempt another study based on a new protocol with more appropriate selection of patients, concomitant chemotherapy, and duration of treatment. May the ARTISTs play a beautiful harmony with perioperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with gastric cancer to complete the Schubert Sinfonie Nr. 7 in h moll D. 759 "Die Unvollendete".


Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Mitsuru Sasako and Mr. Akio Ohtera for their scientific advices.


References

  1. Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with paraaortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359:453-62.[LinkOut]
  2. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:439-49.[LinkOut]
  3. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1810-20.[LinkOut]
  4. Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:315-21.[LinkOut]
  5. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 2001;345:725-30.[LinkOut]
  6. Lee J, Lim do H, Kim S, et al. Phase III Trial Comparing Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin With Concurrent Capecitabine Radiotherapy in Completely Resected Gastric Cancer With D2 Lymph Node Dissection: The ARTIST Trial. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:268-73.[LinkOut]
  7. Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:4387-93.[LinkOut]
  8. The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association ( JGCA) issued the first version of gastric cancer treatment guidelines (GL) in March 2001. Available online: http://www.jgca.jp/PDFfiles/E-gudeline.PDF
  9. Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol 2009;20:666-73.[LinkOut]
  10. Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;358:36-46.[LinkOut]
  11. Roh MS, Yothers GA, O'Connell MJ, et al. The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-04 [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:S3503.
  12. Hofheinz R, Wenz FK, Post S, et al. Capecitabine (Cape) versus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based (neo)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): Long-term results of a randomized, phase III trial. 2011 ASCO Annual meeting 2011 Abstract 3504. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:S3504.
  13. Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Twelves C, et al. XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2084-91.[LinkOut]
  14. Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi F, et al. X-ray irradiation induces thymidine phosphorylase and enhances the efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda) in human cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:2948-53.[LinkOut]
  15. Macdonald JS, Benedetti J, Smalley SR, et al. Chemoradiation of resected gastric cancer: A 10-year follow-up of the phase III trial INT0116 (SWOG 9008). J Clin Oncol 27:15s, 2009;suppl; abstr 4515.