Radical proximal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma
Masters of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Radical proximal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

Chengwu Zhang, Wei Miao, Ning Liu, Rui Ge, Cheng Wang

Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810001, China

Corresponding to: Chengwu Zhang, Master. Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810001, China. Email: Xtoof@sina.com.

Abstract: Radical proximal gastrectomy is one of the most commonly used conventional surgeries for gastric carcinoma. Its indications include: small early cancer of the upper stomach; localized cancer in the upper stomach; gastric cancer without metastasis; and gastric cancer with only lymph node station 1 metastasis. When the tumor stage was basically confirmed after the corresponding pre-operative examinations, radical proximal gastrectomy was scheduled in this case. With an attempt to share our experiences with colleagues in our hospital and in Qinghai province, we briefly describe this procedure performed in our department in this video, with its main contents including name of surgery, time, key steps, and post-operative pathology.

Keywords: Radical proximal gastrectomy; gastric carcinoma; surgery procedure


Submitted May 07, 2013. Accepted for publication May 27, 2013.

doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4778.2013.05.21


Video 1 Radical proximal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

Video description

The patient was placed supine and in a split-legged position after general anesthesia. After routine disinfection, the surgical field was covered with a sterile surgical towel. An abdominal median incision of about 14 cm was made to gain access to abdominal cavity. After the exploration of the abdominal cavity, radical proximal subtotal gastrectomy was planned (Video 1, Figures1-7). The adjacent tissues around the incision were covered by an incision protector. After the greater omentum was flipped and raised, the operator stretched the transverse colon, and separated the omentum along its attachment to the transverse colon with an electric knife. Meanwhile, the anterior lobe of the greater omentum was separated. Along the greater curvature of stomach, splenocolic ligament, gastrosplenic ligament, Huschke’s ligament and the left gastroepiploic artery, short gastric artery, and left gastric artery inside it were dissociated, double ligated, and cut. Furthermore, the anterior lobe of the transverse mesocolon was separated, and the adhesion between stomach and pancreatic capsule were dissociated, whereas the gastric branches of the right gastroepiploic vein and the right gastric artery were preserved. After the hepatogastric ligament was cut along the liver edge (up to the right side of the esophagus), both sides of the esophagus and its anterior and posterior walls (about 5 cm) were dissociated. The gastric body was pulled down. The gastric tube was inserted into the esophagus. Purse-string device was placed 3 cm above the cardia. After the esophagus was transected, the stapler was inserted and the purse string was tightened to cut away about three-fourths of the stomach. The body of stomach was transected at 6 cm to the lower border of the tumor. The residual stomach at the lesser curvature was closed with a surgical stapler. The stump was buried with purse, and the seromuscular layer was sutured. After the residual stomach was lifted up, the incision was opened to insert the stapler, which reached out the posterior wall of stomach. The staple (domestic 26# stapler) rod was attached to the staple body. The stapler and flip the switch was tightened to complete the anastomosis between stomach and esophagus. Efforts must be made to ensure the accuracy and patency of the anastomosis. The integrity of the anastomosis ring should be checked. After the placement of the feeding tube and the gastric tube, the greater curvature of stomach was closed using a stapler. The stump was similarly buried as in the seromuscular layer. The esophagogastric anastomosis was sutured in a continuous manner. The anastomosis tension was decreased. 5-fluorouracil was intraperitoneally injected, which would be released at a constant concentration in 500 hours. A drainage tube was placed at the left side of the esophagogastric anastomosis to check whether there was any active bleeding. After the gauzes and surgical instruments were carefully checked off, the peritoneum was closed, and the muscles and skins were sutured. The surgery was successful, during which the anesthesia was satisfactory. The intraoperative blood loss was about 180 mL. The patient was taken back to the ward after she had regained consciousness. After communication with the patient’s family, the specimens and lymph node stations were sent for pathological examination.
Figure 1 A. Dissection of the anterior lobe of the transverse mesocolon; B. Dissection of pancreatic capsule; C. Transection of left gastroepiploic vein
Figure 2 A. Dissection of lymph node stations 10 and 11; B. Transection of gastrosplenic ligament; C. Dissection of splenic hilar lymph nodes
Figure 3 A. Dissociation of abdominal esophagus; B. Incision in lesser omentum; C. Dissection of lymph node station 5 and transaction of right gastric vessels
Figure 4 A. Dissection of lymph node station 8; B. Left gastric artery; Coronary vein; C. Dissection of lymph node station 7; the left gastric artery and vein were exposed
Figure 5 A. Dissection of lymph nodes in the greater curvature of stomach; B. Dissection of lymph nodes in the lesser curvature of stomach; C. Isolating the stomach
Figure 6 A. Digestive tract reconstruction; B. Digestive tract reconstruction; C. Placing the feeding tube into the small intestine
Figure 7 A. Closure of the gastric stump; B. Buried suture of the anastomosi; C. Specimens

Acknowledgements

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Cite this article as: Zhang C, Miao W, Liu N, Ge R, Wang C. Radical proximal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Transl Gastrointest Cancer 2013;2(S1):65-68. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4778.2013.05.21