63. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically detected blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in colorectal carcinoma: Its impact on prognosis
Background: The prognostic significance of blood vessel invasion
(BVI) and lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) is unclear. Because of
the absence of specific makers for venous lymphatic vessels, earlier
studies could not reliably distinguish between BVI and LVI.
Methods: By immunostaining for podoplanin and CD34 antigen,
we retrospectively investigated LVI and BVI in 419 tissue specimens
of colorectal carcinoma. We performed univariate and multivariate
analysis of the clinicopathologic features, Frequency of recurrence,
and outcome of patients with or without LVI and BVI.
Results: The use of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining
to identify BVI and LVI yielded a false positive rate of 9.1%
and false negative rate of 12.6%. The incidence of BVI was
significantly higher among tumors with LVI than tumors without
LVI (P<0.001). In logistic multivariate analysis, only LVI
(P<0.001) was associated with lymph node metastasis and BVI
(P=0.015) was associated with distant recurrence. Calculating
the prognostic relevance, both two invasion types correlated
with decreased survival in univariate analysis (both P<0.001),
In multivariate analysis, BVI (P=0.024), lymph node status
(P=0.003) and tumor stage (P<0.001) remained statistically
significant factors for survival.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that immunohistologic
evaluation of BVI and LVI could be useful in colorectal
carcinoma indicating the risk of lymph node metastasis and
recurrence, thereby contributing to prognostic evaluation.
Key words
Blood vessel invasion (BVI); lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI); colorectal carcinoma